|
Home
-Press
Release
-Archive
Press Releases July, 2007
|
|

Press Releases
July,
2007 |
Press Information Bureau
Government of
India
***
|
|
Date
Release
|
|
10th July 2007 |
Index of Six
Infrastructure Industries (Base: 1993-94=100) May 2007
PRESS NOTE
The Index of Six core-infrastructure industries having a combined weight
of 26.7 per cent in the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) with base
1993-94 stood at 234.1 (provisional) in May 2007 and registered a growth
of 8.7% (provisional) compared to a growth of 7.2 % in May 2006. During
April-May 2007-08, six core-infrastructure industries registered a growth
of 8.1%(provisional) as against 7.2% during the corresponding period of
the previous year.
Crude
Petroleum
Crude petroleum production (weight of 4.17% in the IIP) registered a
negative growth of 1.6%
(provisional)
in May 2007 compared to a
growth rate of 1.2% in May 2006. The Crude petroleum production
registered a growth of (-)0.1% (provisional) during April-May 2007-08
compared to (-) 0.3% during the same period of 2006-07.
Petroleum
Refinery Products
Petroleum refinery production
(weight of 2.00% in the IIP) registered a growth of 14.9%
(provisional)
in May 2007 compared to
growth of 12.1%
in May 2006. The
Petroleum refinery production registered
a growth of 15.0% (provisional) during April-May 2007-08 compared to 12.6%
during the same period of 2006-07.
Coal
Coal production (weight of 3.22% in the IIP) registered a growth of 0.9%
(provisional)
in May 2007 compared to a growth rate 8.3% in May 2006. Coal production
grew
by 0.7% (provisional) during April-May 2007-08 compared to an
increase of 5.9% during the same period of 2006-07.
Electricity
Electricity
generation (weight of 10.17% in the IIP)
registered a growth of 9.3%
(provisional)
in May 2007 compared to a growth rate 5.1% in May 2006. Electricity
generation grew by 9.0% (provisional) during April-May 2007-08 compared to 5.5%
during the same period of 2006-07.
Cement
Cement production
(weight of 1.99% in the IIP)
registered a growth of
9.4%
(provisional)
in
May
2007 compared to 6.8% in May 2006. Cement Production
grew by 7.4%
(provisional) during April-May 2007-08 compared to an increase of 9.4%
during the same period of 2006-07.
.
Finished
(carbon) steel
Finished (carbon) Steel production
(weight of 5.13% in the IIP)
registered a growth of 11.8%
(provisional)
in May 2007 compared to 10.7% (estimated) in May 2006. Finished (carbon)
Steel production grew by 10.1 (provisional) during
April-May 2007-08 compared to an increase of 10.4% during the same period
of 2006-07.
N.B:
Data are provisional. Revision has been made based on revised data
obtained.
|
PERFORMANCE OF SIX INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRIES
May 2007
(Weight in IIP: 26.68 %) |
|
Base Year: 1993-94 |
|
Sector-wise Growth Rate (%) in Production |
|
Sector |
Weight (%) |
May-06 |
May-07 |
Apr-May
06-07 |
Apr-May
07-08 |
|
Crude Petroleum |
4.17 |
1.2 |
-1.6 |
-0.3 |
-0.1 |
|
Petroleum Refinery Products |
2.00 |
12.1 |
14.9 |
12.6 |
15.0 |
|
Coal |
3.22 |
8.3 |
0.9 |
5.9 |
0.7 |
|
Electricity |
10.17 |
5.1 |
9.3 |
5.5 |
9.0 |
|
Cement |
1.99 |
6.8 |
9.4 |
9.4 |
7.4 |
|
Finished steel (carbon) |
5.13 |
10.7 |
11.8 |
10.4 |
10.1 |
|
Overall |
26.68 |
7.2 |
8.7 |
7.2 |
8.1 |
|
Source of data: Concerned Ministries/Departments/Organization(s)
|
|
Month |
INDEX |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
195.8 |
210.0 |
225.6 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
|
May |
200.9 |
215.3 |
234.1 |
7.2 |
8.7 |
|
June |
196.7 |
211.9 |
|
7.7 |
|
|
July |
193.3 |
214.1 |
|
10.8 |
|
|
August |
198.4 |
211.3 |
|
6.5 |
|
|
September |
192.9 |
213.2 |
|
10.5 |
|
|
October |
207.3 |
227.7 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
November |
202.4 |
221.6 |
|
9.5 |
|
|
December |
214.7 |
233.0 |
|
8.5 |
|
|
January |
219.6 |
237.6 |
|
8.2 |
|
|
February |
205.2 |
220.6 |
|
7.5 |
|
|
March |
231.3 |
254.3 |
|
9.9 |
|
|
Apr –May
|
198.3 |
212.6 |
229.9 |
7.2 |
8.1 |
|
N.B:
Indices and Growth rates are provisional |
CRUDE PETROLEUM PRODUCTION
|
|
Weight: 4.17% |
|
Month
|
Production (in Thousand tonnes) |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
2802 |
2752 |
2791 |
-1.8 |
1.4 |
|
May |
2830 |
2863 |
2818 |
1.2 |
-1.6 |
|
June |
2792 |
2826 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
July |
2751 |
2863 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
August |
2411 |
2702 |
|
12.1 |
|
|
September |
2572 |
2813 |
|
9.4 |
|
|
October |
2679 |
2928 |
|
9.3 |
|
|
November |
2563 |
2815 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
December |
2642 |
2924 |
|
10.7 |
|
|
January |
2770 |
2901 |
|
4.7 |
|
|
February |
2542 |
2666 |
|
4.9 |
|
|
March |
2844 |
2934 |
|
3.2 |
|
|
April-May |
5632 |
5615 |
5609 |
-0.3 |
-0.1 |
|
Note:
1. Cumulative total may not tally with monthly total;
2. Production data and Growth rates are provisional.
Source: Ministry of
Petroleum & Natural Gas
|
OUTPUT OF PETROLEUM REFINERY
PRODUCTS
|
|
Weight: 2.00% |
|
Month
|
Production (in Thousand tonnes) |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
8947 |
10118 |
11642 |
13.1 |
15.1 |
|
May |
9624 |
10784 |
12396 |
12.1 |
14.9 |
|
June |
9896 |
10940 |
|
10.5 |
|
|
July |
10096 |
11370 |
|
12.6 |
|
|
August |
10042 |
11257 |
|
12.1 |
|
|
September |
9776 |
11083 |
|
13.4 |
|
|
October |
9719 |
11473 |
|
18.1 |
|
|
November |
9853 |
11467 |
|
16.4 |
|
|
December |
10754 |
11423 |
|
6.2 |
|
|
January |
10857 |
11854 |
|
9.2 |
|
|
February |
10098 |
11241 |
|
11.3 |
|
|
March |
11089 |
12577 |
|
13.4 |
|
|
April-May |
18570 |
20903 |
24038 |
12.6 |
15.0 |
|
Note: 1. Cumulative total may not tally with monthly total
2. Output and Growth rates are provisional.
3.
The figure are estimated on the basis of data
on refinery production (in terms of crude throughput)
Source:
Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas
|
COAL PRODUCTION
|
|
Weight: 3.22% |
|
Month
|
Production (in Million tones) |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
30.50 |
31.53 |
31.69 |
3.4 |
0.5 |
|
May |
30.67 |
33.23 |
33.54 |
8.3 |
0.9 |
|
June |
28.54 |
31.95 |
|
11.9 |
|
|
July |
28.14 |
31.12 |
|
10.6 |
|
|
August |
29.03 |
29.09 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
September |
29.42 |
29.23 |
|
-0.6 |
|
|
October |
32.96 |
33.65 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
November |
34.69 |
36.38 |
|
4.9 |
|
|
December |
38.39 |
39.50 |
|
2.9 |
|
|
January |
38.32 |
42.15 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
February |
36.90 |
39.35 |
|
6.6 |
|
|
March |
43.82 |
48.49 |
|
10.6 |
|
|
April-May |
61.17 |
64.76 |
65.23 |
5.9 |
0.7 |
|
Note :
1. Cumulative total may not tally with monthly
total
2. Production data and Growth rates are provisional.
Source :
Department of Coal |
ELECTRICITY GENERATION
|
|
WEIGHT: 10.17% |
|
Month
|
Generation (in Gwh) |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
50413.2 |
53394.9 |
58026.7 |
5.9 |
8.7 |
|
May |
52942.6 |
55630.8 |
60814.1 |
5.1 |
9.3 |
|
June |
50948.9 |
53450.6 |
|
4.9 |
|
|
July |
49781.1 |
54224.2 |
|
8.9 |
|
|
August |
52145.2 |
54295.8 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
September |
48694.5 |
54289.3 |
|
11.5 |
|
|
October |
52217.7 |
57292.5 |
|
9.7 |
|
|
November |
49405.3 |
53721.3 |
|
8.7 |
|
|
December |
52257.1 |
57095.6 |
|
9.3 |
|
|
January |
53759.6 |
58320.6 |
|
8.5 |
|
|
February |
50225.4 |
51902.3 |
|
3.3 |
|
|
March |
54719.9 |
59075.3 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
April-May |
103355.8 |
109025.7 |
118840.8 |
5.5 |
9.0 |
|
Note : 1. Cumulative total may not tally with monthly total;
2. Generation and Growth rates are provisional.
3. Electricity generation data includes also imports
from
Bhutan
Source: Ministry of Power |
CEMENT PRODUCTION
|
|
Weight: 1.99% |
|
Month
|
Production (Thousand Tonnes) |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
12240 |
13730 |
14475 |
12.2 |
5.4 |
|
May |
12630 |
13490 |
14760 |
6.8 |
9.4 |
|
June |
12010 |
13410 |
|
11.7 |
|
|
July |
11160 |
12720 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
August |
11160 |
11480 |
|
2.9 |
|
|
September |
10845 |
12630 |
|
16.5 |
|
|
October |
12218 |
13370 |
|
9.4 |
|
|
November |
11599 |
12970 |
|
11.8 |
|
|
December |
12968 |
14010 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
January |
13571 |
14550 |
|
7.2 |
|
|
February |
12757 |
13500 |
|
5.8 |
|
|
March |
14650 |
15450 |
|
5.5 |
|
|
April-May |
24870 |
27220 |
29235 |
9.4 |
7.4 |
|
|
FINISHED (CARBON) STEEL
PRODUCTION
|
|
Weight: 5.13% |
|
Month
|
Production (in Thousand Tonnes) |
Growth Rates (%) |
|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
April |
3414 |
3758 |
4079 |
10.1 |
8.5 |
|
May |
3370 |
3732 |
4171 |
10.7 |
11.8 |
|
June |
3414 |
3762 |
|
10.2 |
|
|
July |
3398 |
3871 |
|
13.9 |
|
|
August |
3639 |
3977 |
|
9.3 |
|
|
September |
3574 |
3946 |
|
10.4 |
|
|
October |
3874 |
4277 |
|
10.4 |
|
|
November |
3847 |
4196 |
|
9.1 |
|
|
December |
3961 |
4356 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
January |
4017 |
4350 |
|
8.3 |
|
|
February |
3728 |
4227 |
|
13.4 |
|
|
March |
4308 |
4938 |
|
14.6 |
|
|
April-May |
6784 |
7490 |
8250 |
10.4 |
10.1 |
|
Note : 1. Cumulative total May not tally with monthly total;
2.
Production Data and Growth rates are
provisional.
Source: Ministry of Steel |
Department of Industrial Policy &
Promotion, Ministry of Commerce & Industry
New Delhi, 10th July, 2007
RJ/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
6th July 2007 |
New Delhi:
July 6, 2007
The Rehabilitation Package for
Closed Tea Gardens is expected to result in revival of 33 closed tea
gardens, which employ more than 30,000 workers. The package will allow
these tea gardens to avail loans and subsidies under the Special Purpose
Tea Fund (SPTF) Scheme for rejuvenation and replantation.
Shri Kamal Nath, Minister of
Commerce & Industry, has said that: “As a medium and long-term
measure, a major stepping up of the rate of replantation and rejuvenation
holds the key to competitiveness of the Indian tea industry, given the
high age profile of tea bushes throughout the country. Over 2 lakh
hectares which fall in the vulnerable category of low yielding areas is to
be targeted for replantation and rejuvenation”. Referring to the
revival of closed tea gardens, the Minister observed that “on
revival, the gardens would infuse additional capital in plants and
machinery resulting into increasing in the crop yields and total tea
production for domestic and export purposes”.
In order to address the problems
of the closed tea gardens, the government had appointed expert committees
to make an in-depth study of gardens lying closed in the States of West
Bengal, Kerala, Assam and Tripura and suggest a package of measures for
their viability and revival. Considering the reports and recommendations
of the committees, the government has approved a Rehabilitation Package
for Closed Tea Gardens. The package is aimed at reviving the closed tea
gardens in the interest of tea garden workers and considering the
importance of the industry in the export performance of the country.
The Package provides for
restructuring of existing outstanding bank loans of closed tea gardens by
converting the same into term loans with a moratorium period of 5 years.
The recovery of the outstanding converted loans would start from 6th
year onwards and upto 10th year. The accumulated penal interest
on the loans will be waived. The banks will charge a simple rate of
interest of 11% per annum on the restructured loan. There will be a
moratorium of one year for payment of the interest. The accumulated simple
interest is to be shared equally by the banks, central government and the
beneficiaries to the extent of one-third each. The loans advanced by the
Tea Board to such gardens would waive. After financial restructuring as
given above these gardens will become eligible to obtain loan and subsidy
from the Tea Board under Rs.4500 crore SPTF scheme for rejuvenation and
replantation. They will also become eligible to get 25% subsidy for
upgradation and modernisation of their factories. An interest subsidy at
the rate of 3% on the working capital loans would be provided by the
government for a period of 5 years on the working capital loans that will
be taken by such gardens for resumption of their operation. Chairman,
Tea Board, will be the nodal officer for implementing the Rehabilitation
package.
****************
RJ/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
6th July 2007 |
New Delhi:
July 6, 2007
Vietnam has requested India to grant market economy status
under the WTO mechanism and stated that its economy is well qualified for
the same.
The request was communicated by Mr. Nguyen Danh Vinh, Deputy Trade
Minister of Vietnam during his meeting with Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Minister of
State for Industry, here today. Dr. Kumar informed the Vietnamese
delegation that a decision on this issue would require a thorough
examination and necessary deliberations at various levels.
Mr. Vinh also emphasised the need to
speedily conclude the Indo-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and made specific
requests for greater market access on certain agricultural products of
importance to Vietnam such as coffee, tea and pepper. Dr. Kumar
observed that the same products are also important to India both in terms
of economic value and employment and any decision on the issue would
require a win-win situation for both countries.
Vietnam expressed keenness to take bilateral
trade with India to a much higher level and hope that greater Indian
investment would flow into Vietnam. While Vietnam had
bilateral trade in excess of US $ 10 billion each with
China and US its trade with India has just touched US $ 1
billion.
Dr. Kumar also agreed with the need for greater economic engagement
between the two countries and highlighted energy sector as one particular
area where Indian companies can invest in Vietnam. “Trade
relations with Vietnam are very much a part of India’s Look East Policy”,
he said.
The Vietnamese Minister proposed setting up
of a Forum for Trade and Investment Policy Exchange which could
provide a platform for engagement of officers and businessmen from both
countries to engage on trade and investment relations, in the area of
investment promotion, tourism, trade facilitation etc. Dr. Kumar agreed
with the value of such a Forum and both countries would work towards
setting up the same.
Major items of export to Vietnam include
oilmeals, drugs & pharmaceuticals, primary & semi-finished iron and steel
etc., while major import items from Vietnam are spices, coal, coke,
organic chemicals etc.
**********
RJ/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
3rd July 2007 |
New Delhi:
July 3, 2007
The total import of sensitive items for the period April 07
has been Rs.1118 crores as compared to Rs.1328 crores during the
corresponding period last year thereby showing a decrease of 15.8%. The
gross import of all commodities during same period of current year was
Rs.17635 crores as compared to Rs.12535 crores during the same period of
last year. Thus import of sensitive items constitute 10.6% and 6.3% of the
gross imports during last year and current year respectively.
Imports of
edible oil, cotton & silk, fruits & vegetables (including nuts), products
of SSI, spices and marble & Granite have shown a decline at broad group
level during the period. Imports of items viz. automobiles, rubber,
Alcoholic beverages and milk & milk products have shown increase during
the period under reference.
In the edible
oil segment, the import has decreased from Rs.810 crores last year to
Rs.625 crores for the corresponding period of this year. The import of
both crude oil as well as refined oil have gone down by 23% and 21.1%
respectively. The fall in edible oil import is mainly due to significant
decrease in import of Soya-bean oil and its fractions (Crude), which has
gone down by 62%.
Imports of
sensitive items from Indonesia, Thailand, Germany, Japan, Pakistan IR,
Bhutan, United Arab Emirates etc. have gone up while those from Argentina,
China P RP, United States of America, Malaysia, Egypt A RP, Sri Lanka DSR
etc. have shown a decrease.
*********
SB/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
3rd July 2007 |
New Delhi:
July 3, 2007
Shri Kamal Nath, Minister of Commerce & Industry, and Mr.
Akira Amari, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan, has
directed the Task Force to finalise a concept paper on Delhi-Mumbai
Industrial Corridor (DMIC) Project before Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo
Abe’s visit to India scheduled for August 2007. The two Ministers welcomed
the announcement of Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) to introduce the Japanese
Depository receipt (JDR) scheme. India can become a first destination for
such scheme that can be also utilised as one of the financial resources
for the development of the DMIC project. This is indicated in the Joint
Statement signed by the two Ministers here last night following the
conclusion of their discussions on DMIC project.
Mr. Akira Amari and Shri Kamal Nath co-chaired the first
meeting of the Japan-India Policy Dialogue (JIPD) between the two
Ministers on the occasion of Minister Amari’s visit to India from June 30
to July 3, 2007. Minister Amari was accompanied by the Japanese business
delegation headed by Mr. Osamu Suzuki, Chairman and CEO of Suzuki Motor
Corporation. At the meeting, the Ministers had extensive discussions to
advance the relevant elements of the agenda of the “Japan-India Special
Economic Partnership (SEPI)”, which was announced by the leaders of the
two countries on December 15, 2006 in Tokyo. The Ministers also discussed
relevant global and regional economic issues such as Doha Development
Agenda (DDA), Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia (CEPEA) and
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). The
Ministers decided to cooperate towards the successful conclusion of the
DDA by the end of 2007.
During the course of the meeting, the Ministers exchanged
views on the DMIC project, which is a flagship cooperation project between
the two countries, based on the discussion at the Task Force for the DMIC
project, co-chaired by Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy &
Promotion (DIPP), Ministry of Commerce & Industry of India and Vice
Minister, Ministry of Economy, Trade & Industry of Japan. The Ministers
welcomed the inputs made and interests shown by the business leaders from
both countries.
The Ministers reaffirmed the importance of facilitating the
business and technology match making between the two countries in a range
of sectors that include food processing and other manufacturing
industries. The Ministers welcomed the MOU between the Confederation of
Indian Industries (CII) and the Japan External Trade Organisation (JETRO)
signed on July 2, 2007 which aims to facilitate closer business
interaction between enterprises in India and Japan.
The Ministers reviewed the status of India-Japan Economic
Partnership Agreement (EPA) / Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement
(CEPA) negotiations and directed the negotiators to expedite the
conclusion of negotiations within the agreed timeframe.
The Ministers discussed some of the outstanding
trade-related issues between India and Japan and decided that the relevant
authorities on both sides need to continue the dialogue for satisfactory
resolution of these issues.
**********
SB/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
3rd July 2007 |
New Delhi:
July 3, 2007
Shri Kamal Nath, Minister of
Commerce & Industry, has warned that the decision of the US Government to
end the GSP (Generalised System of Preferences) for gold jewellery and
brass lamps from India could lead to a number of jobs being lost in the
jewellery sector in India. In reply to a question after his recent
speech at the Carnegie Endowment meet in Washington asking about India’s
reaction to the US decision, Shri Kamal Nath said that “GSP is a
unilateral programme of the US government and is not a result of
negotiations with GSP beneficiaries. Hence, it is upto US government to
decide on how it wishes to administer the programme. However, the
decision is likely to lead to a number of jobs being lost in the jewellery
sector in India, specially among vulnerable groups of society”.
On 28th June, 2007, the
US Administration decided not to renew the Competitive Needs Limitation (CNL)
Waiver for gold jewellery and brass lamps from India, thereby ending the
GSP preference. The Federal Register Notice is expected to be published
soon and the changes will be effective within seven days of publication.
GSP has been withdrawn from 8 out of 9 products for which the review was
carried out under the new regulations. The only country for which it has
been continued is Columbia for mini carnations.
*********
SB/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
2nd July 2007 |
DELHI-MUMBAI INDUSTRIAL
CORRIDOR TO PASS THROUGH MADHYA PRADESH: KAMAL NATH
New Delhi, 2
July, 2007
The Delhi Mumbai
Industrial Corridor (DMIC) will pass through Madhya Pradesh as well, Shri
Kamal Nath, Minister of Commerce and Industry, announced at a joint press
conference with the visiting Japanese Minister of Economy, Trade and
Industry, here this afternoon. The massive project, with an investment
requirement of US $ 90 billion spread over seven years is expected to
transform the industrial landscape of over half a dozen states through
which it will pass, including Madhya Pradesh, Shri Kamal Nath said.
The project
will see major expansion of infrastructure and industry – including
industrial clusters and rail, road, port, air connectivity – in the states
along the route of the Corridor.
Conceived to
be developed as a Global Manufacturing and Trading Hub, the project is
expected to double employment potential, triple industrial output and
quadruple exports from the region in 5 years. The total employment to be
generated from the project – to be launched in January 2008 – is 3
million, the bulk of which will be in the manufacturing/processing
sectors.
The first
phase of the project is scheduled to be completed by 2012, the Minister
said.
*********
SB/MRS
Back
|
|
2nd July 2007 |
New Delhi:
July 2, 2007
Cumulative value of India’s
merchandise exports for the period April-May, 2007 was US $ 22436.39
million ($ 22.4 billion) or Rs.92944.16 Crore as against US $ 18639.50
million ($ 18.6 billion) or Rs.84243.20 Crore during the same period last
year, registering an increase of 20.37%. Merchandise exports during May,
2007 were valued at US $ 11861.28 million which was 18.07 % higher than
the level of US $ 10045.99 million during May, 2006. In rupee terms,
exports touched Rs.48371.98 crore, which was 6.04% higher than the value
of exports during May, 2006.
India’s Imports during May, 2007 were valued at US $ 18077.81
million representing an increase of 26.36 % over the level of imports
valued at US $ 14306.76 million in May, 2006. In Rupee terms, imports
increased by 13.49 %. Cumulative value of imports for the period
April-May, 2007 was US$ 35713.14 million (Rs.148053.58 Crore) as against
US$ 26841.29 million (Rs.121304.73 Crore) during the same period last
year
Oil imports during May, 2007 were valued at US $ 4740.29 million
which was 2.99% lower than oil imports valued at US $ 4886.44 million in
the corresponding period last year. Oil imports during April-May, 2007
were valued at US $ 9165.20 million which was 1.01% higher than the oil
imports of US $ 9073.62 million in the corresponding period last year.
Non-oil imports during May, 2007 were estimated at US $
13337.52 million which was 41.58 % higher than growth on non oil imports
of US$ 9420.32 million in May, 2006. Non-oil imports during April-May,
2007 were valued at US$ 26547.94 million which was 49.42% higher than the
level of such imports valued at US$ 17767.67 million in April-May,
2006.
The
trade deficit for April-May, 2007 was estimated at US $ 13276.75 million
which was higher than the deficit at US $ 8201.79 million during
April-May, 2006.
Tables showing India’s exports, imports and
trade balance, according to the Directorate General of Commercial
Intelligence & Statistics (DGCI&S), is attached.
|
Press
Information Bureau
Government of India
*** |
|
EXPORTS & IMPORTS:
(US $ Million) |
|
(PROVISIONAL) |
|
|
|
|
MAY |
APRIL-MAY |
|
EXPORTS (including
re-exports) |
|
|
|
2006-2007 |
10045.99 |
18639.50 |
|
2007-2008 |
11861.28 |
22436.39 |
|
%Growth 2007-2008/
2006-2007 |
18.07 |
20.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTS |
|
|
|
2006-2007 |
14306.76 |
26841.29 |
|
2007-2008 |
18077.81 |
35713.14 |
|
%Growth 2007-2008/
2006-2007 |
26.36 |
33.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
TRADE BALANCE |
|
|
|
2006-2007 |
-4260.77 |
-8201.79 |
|
2007-2008 |
-6216.53 |
-13276.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
EXPORTS & IMPORTS:
(Rs. Crores) |
|
(PROVISIONAL) |
|
|
|
|
MAY |
APRIL-MAY |
|
EXPORTS (including
re-exports) |
|
|
|
2006-2007 |
45616.13 |
84243.20 |
|
2007-2008 |
48371.98 |
92944.16 |
|
%Growth 2007-2008/
2006-2007 |
6.04 |
10.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTS |
|
|
|
2006-2007 |
64963.15 |
121304.73 |
|
2007-2008 |
73723.84 |
148053.58 |
|
%Growth 2007-2008/
2006-2007 |
13.49 |
22.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
TRADE BALANCE |
|
|
|
2006-2007 |
-19347.02 |
-37061.53 |
|
2007-2008 |
-25351.86 |
-55109.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figures for 2006-07
are the latest revised whereas figures for 2007-08 are provisional. |
SB/NR/MRS
Back
|
|
2nd July 2007 |
US $ 90
BILLION DELHI-MUMBAI INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR PROJECT AT AN ADVANCE STAGE OF
FINALISATION
KAMAL NATH AND AKIRA AMARI DISCUSS LANDMARK INDO-JAPAN PROJECT WITH
STAKEHOLDERS
New Delhi:
July 2, 2007
The
Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) project, with an estimated
investment of US $ 90 billion, is at an advance stage of finalisation.
This was indicated by Shri Kamal Nath, Minister of Commerce and Industry,
at the Indo-Japan CEO Luncheon Meeting here today, which he attended
along with Mr. Akira Amari, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and
members of the Japanese business delegation.
Stating
that DMIC will become yet another fine example of Indo-Japanese
collaboration, Shri Kamal Nath referred to India’s successful
experience with Japan in the development of the Delhi metro and said he
was confident that the DMIC would add another successful chapter to the
saga of Indo-Japan partnership in India.
“Stakeholders have taken a decision to set up 5 investment regions and 5
industrial regions, one in each state in the Phase I. The first phase is
scheduled to be completed by 2012, in synchronization with the Dedicated
Rail Freight Corridor. Later on, more such investment regions will be
identified in consultation with the states. The approach in DMIC project
is to work within the present system of policies and incentives and
provide global quality infrastructure to spur the industrial growth
further. Feasibility of infrastructure development will come by coverage
of a large impact area and the excellent rail, road and port
connectivity. We have set ourselves a project goal of doubling
employment potential and tripling the industrial output”, the Minister
said, adding that the investment of US $ 90 billion would be spread over a
7-year period.
The
project is expected to transform the industrial landscape across
half-a-dozen Indian states leading to the rapid development of
industrial as well as physical infrastructure along the route of the
corridor.
Given the
importance of this massive project and its positive economic fallout,
especially in terms of employment, Shri Kamal Nath said: “I am of
the view that though DMIC is a North-Western India specific project, such
initiatives should not be restricted to a particular area, but
replicated all over India. Other Indian states like West Bengal have
already expressed their willingness to replicate this model and I expect
initial studies on the proposed eastern India corridor to begin early next
year. With India stepping up the pace of infrastructure development,
I invite Japanese companies to utilise the investment opportunities
arising out of India’s thrust on infrastructure.
This is your chance to convert your investments into
productive business opportunities”.
Today’s
interaction as well as the visit of the Japanese delegation in connection
with the DMIC has been organised by the
Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP) Ministry of Commerce
and Industry; Ministry of Economy, Trade & Industry (METI) of Japan in
association with the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and the Japan
External Trade Organisation (JETRO).
Mr.
Amari, accompanied by a delegation of Japanese business executives of
around 15 leading Japanese companies headed by Mr. Osama Suzuki, Chairman
of Suzuki Motor Corporation/Japan, is currently on a visit to India to
participate in discussions relating to the “Delhi Mumbai Industrial
Corridor” and the meeting of the “Second Japan-India Energy
Dialogue” between the two countries.
Mr. Amari had a bilateral
interaction with Shri Kamal Nath this evening. Mr. Shigeyuki Tomita,
Senior Vice Minister of Finance of Japan, also called on Shri Kamal Nath
later today.
*******
SB/NR/MRS
Back
|