F.N0. 14/13/2004-DGAD: WHEREAS M/s National Organic Chemicals Industries Ltd. (herein after referred to as NOCIL or applicant) has filed an application before the Designated Authority (hereinafter referred to as this Authority), in accordance with the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as amended in 1995 (herein after referred to as the Act) and Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (herein after referred to as the Rules), alleging dumping of Certain Rubber Chemicals namely MOR, PX13 and TDQ (herein after referred to as subject goods), originating in or exported from the European Union, USA, Chinese Taipei and People Republic of China (herein after referred to as subject countries/territories) and requested for initiation of Anti Dumping investigations for levy of anti dumping duties on the subject goods.

AND WHEREAS, this Authority finds that sufficient prima facie evidence of dumping of the subject goods from the subject countries/territories, injury to the domestic industry and causal link between the dumping and injury exist, this Authority hereby initiates an investigation into the alleged dumping, and consequent injury to the domestic industry in terms of the Rules 5 of the said Rules, to determine the existence, degree and effect of any alleged dumping and to recommend the amount of antidumping duty, which if levied would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry.

The products under consideration are certain specific rubber chemicals used in manufacture of rubber products, namely:

i) Anti Degradants PX 13

ii) Accelerators: MOR

ii) Antioxidant TDQ

Detailed chemical names of the products are as follows:-

MOR is produced by reacting Mercapto benzothiazole disulphide with morpholine and sodium hypochlorite in presence of isopropyl alcohol. The product is filtered, washed and extruded to form pallets, which are dried and packed.

PX-13 is produced by hydrogenation of a mixture of 4-nitrodiphenylamine and methyl isobutyl ketone in an autoclave at moderately high pressure in presence of a noble metal catalyst.

TDQ is produced by polymerization of acetone and aniline, condensed at high temperature in presence of an acid catalyst.

These rubber chemicals are extensively used in treating natural rubber, synthetic rubber (SBR, Butadiene Rubber, Nitrile Rubber, Carboxylated Rubber) and other synthetic rubber based compounds used for manufacture of various rubber products

Other rubber chemicals used in various other uses are not covered within the scope of the product under consideration.

The products under consideration are classified under various subheadings of customs classification heads 38.12.10, 38.12.20 and 38.12.30 as well as under 29.34.20 and 29.25.20 (at six digit levels) of the Customs Tariff Act and ITC HS classification. The Customs and ITC HS classifications are however, indicative only are in no way binding on the scope of the present investigation.

The application has been filed by M/s National Organic Chemicals Industries Ltd., Mumbai (NOCUL). Opinion of the other known producers of the products involved was also called for in terms of their support and on opposition to the application filed by NOCIL. Standing requirement of the applicant has been examined in terms of the Rule 5 of the said Rules against individual products and this Authority is of the opinion that the applicant commands major proportion of domestic production of the products involved and therefore, satisfy the criteria of standing as domestic industry to file this application in terms of Rule 5(3) (a) of the Rules.

The applicant has claimed that each individual product included in the application is a stand-alone product and does not have inter se substitutability with other rubber chemicals. These are specific chemicals used in specific recipe used for manufacture of different types of rubber products and cannot be substituted for other chemicals under the same categories. Moreover, the rubber chemicals included in the present application are also not inter se substitutable or inter se like products as these materials are used for specific end applications. Therefore, dumping margins and all other analysis, including injury to the domestic industry will be done on individual products.

These individual products are known by their chemical, as well as trade names world-over and there is no difference between the product manufactured by the domestic producer and the products imported from subject Countries/territories. The products are being directly imported by the user industries and also by traders for supply to other industries. The consumers are using the domestic and corresponding import products interchangeably.

The products produced by the domestic industry and imported from subject Countries/territories are identical in all essential characteristics and therefore, like articles within the meaning of the term as per the Rules.

The ex-works normal value of the subject goods in the subject countries/territories have been estimated on the basis of the data available on selling price as well as cost of production of the goods in the subject countries after allowing admissible adjustments to arrive at ex-works prices.

The applicant has claimed that China is a non-market economy country and should be treated so in terms of the Rules subject to rebuttal of presumption in terms Paragraph 7 and 8 of Annexure I of the AD Rules as amended vide Customs Notification No. 101/2003 dated 10.11.2003

In view of the Non-market economy claim this Authority has prima facie considered the Constructed Normal Value in China based on cost of manufacturing the subject goods in terms of Para 7 & 8 of the Annexure 1 to the said Rules as amended.

The export prices of individual products have been estimated on the basis of data collected from DGCI&S and other secondary sources. Adjustments on account of ocean freight, marine insurance, commission, inland transportation in the Countries/territories of export, port handling and port charges have been made to arrive at the Export Price at ex-factory level.

There is sufficient evidence that Normal Values of the subject goods in the subject countries/territories are significantly higher than the net export prices indicating prima-facie that the subject goods are being dumped in the Indian market by exporters from the subject countries/territories.

Petitioners have furnished information on various parameters relating to injury on account of individual products separately. Parameters, such as increase in volume of imports both in absolute terms and in relation to the demand of the products, loss in market share, price under-cutting, price under-selling, Price depression, low return on investments, profitability and cash loss in the manufacturing of subject goods, prima-facie indicate, collectively and cumulatively, that the Domestic Industry has suffered material injury on account of dumping from the subject countries/territories.

Countries/territories involved The Countries/territories involved in the present investigation are the European Union, USA, Chinese Taipei and Peoples Republic of China.

Period of investigation (POI) : The period of investigation (POI) for the purpose of present investigation is 1.1.2003 to 31.12.2003. The injury investigation period will however, cover the period 2000-01 to 2002-03 and the POI.

Submission of information : The exporters in the subject Countries/territories, their governments through their embassies/ representatives in India, the importers and users in India known to be concerned and the domestic industry are requested to submit relevant information in the form and manner prescribed and to make their views known to the:

The Designated Authority
Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties
Department of Commerce
Udyog Bhavan
New Delhi-110011.

Any other interested party may also make its submissions relevant to the investigation in the prescribed form and manner within the time limit set out below.

Any information relating to the present investigation should be sent in writing so as to reach the Authority at the address mentioned above not later than forty (40) days from the date of publication of this notification. The known exporters and importers, who are being addressed separately, are however, required to submit the information within (40) forty days from the date of the letter addressed to them.

In terms of Rule 6(7), any interested party may inspect the public file containing non-confidential version of the evidence submitted by other interested parties. In case where an interested party refuses access to, or otherwise does not provide necessary information within a reasonable period, or significantly impedes the investigation, the Authority may record its findings on the basis of the facts available to it and make such recommendations to the Central Government as deemed fit.

Back